On 5 April 2017 at 23:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> On 2017-04-05 17:18:24 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> On 5 April 2017 at 04:19, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>> > On 2017-04-04 22:32:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> >> I'm much happier with this. I'm still fixing some issues in the tests
>>> >> for 03 and tidying them up, but 03 should allow 01 and 02 to be
>>> >> reviewed in their proper context now.
>>> >
>>> > To me this very clearly is too late for v10, and now should be moved to
>>> > the next CF.
>>>
>>> I tend to agree that it's late in the piece. It's still worth cleaning
>>> it up into a state ready for early pg11 though.
>>
>> Totally agreed.
>
> Based on this exchange, marked as "Moved to next CF".
Yeah. Can't say I like it, but I have to agree.
Can get this rolling in early pg11, and that way we can hopefully get
support for it into logical replication too.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
