Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YECf8=OTicqwBxNOvnGd90RbKjGKcHKDdFOS2jcuEA6xg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 March 2016 at 00:14, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
 
Doing it in the backup label file is obviously a different target, where we might need to consider backwards compatibility, Should we?

As part of the failover slots a few folks at 2ndQ looked into whether tools would get upset by the addition of new label file entries. Everything we found used regexps to find what they wanted and didn't care in the slightest about new lines. So I wouldn't worry too much. 

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Date:
Subject: Re: about google summer of code 2016
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots