Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Isaac Morland
Subject Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Date
Msg-id CAMsGm5eAOqM9ZebZrOXWFE-GFR-u0ngHa_j-G_hrh3t1RE8b1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 at 13:51, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
 
> Are you proposing a switch that would make PostgreSQL error out if
> somebody wants to use an unassigned code point?  That would be an
> option.

You can use a CHECK(UNICODE_ASSIGNED(t)) in version 17, and in version
18 I have a proposal here to make it a database-level option:

And if you define a domain over text with this check, you would effectively have a type that works exactly like text except you can only store assigned code points in it. Then use that instead of text everywhere (easy to audit with a query over the system tables).

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Add support to TLS 1.3 cipher suites and curves lists