On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>
> Are you talking about the patch to avoid restored WAL segments from being
> re-archived (commit 6f4b8a4f4f7a2d683ff79ab59d3693714b965e3d), or the bug
> that that unarchived WALs were deleted after crash (commit
> b5ec56f664fa20d80fe752de494ec96362eff520)? The former was included in 9.2.0
> already, and the latter will be included in the next point release.
>
...
>
> I don't know what the release schedule is. I take that to be a request to
> put out a new minor release ASAP.
+1 from me. I'm rather uncomfortable running a system with this
unarchived deletion bug.
Cheers,
Jeff
