On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
>
> IMHO many of the patches that are currently marked as "needs review" and
> have no reviewers, were actually reviewed or are being discussed
> thoroughly on the list, but this information was not propagated to the
> CF page.
Should active discussion on the hackers list prevent someone from
doing a review? I know I am reluctant to review a patch when it seems
it is still being actively redesigned/debated by others.
Maybe a new status of "needs design consensus" would be useful.
Cheers,
Jeff
