Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yu0NHv7apv_RFav7WVQN+89nb333ZoNpA7fOw7dpNksA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
Responses Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com> wrote:

We require complete data isolation. Absolutely nothing should be shared between two tenants.

Then you need different clusters per tenant.  Otherwise, the WAL records of different tenants are inextricably mingled together.

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] pgAdmin 4 v1.0 Released!
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases