Re: WAL archive (archive_mode = always) ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: WAL archive (archive_mode = always) ?
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yR2sd4+YzdVYoPBtWXukS7wnbji72VWVAExA_QS3iYmA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL archive (archive_mode = always) ?  (Adelino Silva <adelino.j.silva@googlemail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:06 AM Adelino Silva <adelino.j.silva@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hello Takayuki,

Sorry can you explain how we can same network bandwidth by not sending the WAL archive from the primary to the standby(s).
I possible scenario is have to multiple standby servers in same host for same master. or other scenarios exists ?

Before  archive_mode = always became available, we've had to stream the WAL twice, once to the hot standby for immediate application, and once to pg_receivexlog for archival purposes.  So it doubled the bandwidth usage.
 
Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Next
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables