Re: pg_stat_*_columns? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: pg_stat_*_columns?
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1y2LLEDeZ1X3AbsR4NChCn9Cz3=W8WSv0-ninOJjYZyCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_*_columns?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_*_columns?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com> wrote:
> Is there any chance the project would accept a patch which adds the
> pg_stat_*_columns-feature without first optimizing the collector?

I doubt it.  It's such a pain point already that massively increasing
the amount of data we need to store does not seem like a good plan.

What if the increase only happened for people who turned on track_column_usage?

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: UPSERT on partition
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: UPSERT on partition