Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1xd4LoLVTiySiTxzoBOoGXMx50XO2C88_FbkMcNMPx43w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job
Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, August 25, 2014, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:


The culprit I found is "bgwriter", which is basically doing nothing to prevent the coming checkpoint IO storm, even though there would be ample time to write the accumulating dirty pages so that checkpoint would find a clean field and pass in a blink. Indeed, at the end of the 500 seconds throttled test, "pg_stat_bgwriter" says:

Are you doing pg_stat_reset_shared('bgwriter') after running pgbench -i?  You don't want your steady state stats polluted by the bulk load.
 

  buffers_checkpoint = 19046
  buffers_clean = 2995

Out of curiosity, what does buffers_backend show?

In any event, this almost certainly is a red herring.  Whichever of the three ways are being used to write out the buffers, it is the checkpointer that is responsible for fsyncing them, and that is where your drama is almost certainly occurring. Writing out with one path rather than a different isn't going to change things, unless you change the fsync.
 
Also, are you familiar with checkpoint_completion_target, and what is it set to?

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: improving speed of make check-world
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Question about coding of free space map