Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1x9-yoCqUU9TB5hF3wYuA9BCc7SMeUaNCBjVeXnwcu9Jg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: Deprecating Hash Indexes  ("ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
> I would be in favor of moving them to contrib for 9.4.  Assuming that
> someone can figure out how this interacts with the existing system table
> opclasses.  Them being in /contrib would also put less pressure on the
> next new hacker who decides to take them on as a feature; they can
> improve them incrementally without needing to fix 100% of issues in the
> first go.

Is there anything currently in contrib that defines its own WAL
records and replay methods?  Are there hooks for doing so?

Cheers,

Jeff



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)