Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1wDGLemnJ_DyrQGiq42zvpbukCJ6eN0z+YjVegOXRbi+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 18:50, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> quadratic behavior in the resource owner/lock table
>
> I didn't want to let that particular phrase go by without saying
> "exactly what behaviour is that?", so we can discuss fixing that also.

It is the thing that was fixed in commit eeb6f37d89fc60c6449ca1, "Add
a small cache of locks owned by a resource owner in ResourceOwner."
But that fix is only in 9.3devel.

Cheers,

Jeff



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unified frontend support for pg_malloc et al and palloc/pfree mulation (was xlogreader-v4)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make