Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Adam Brusselback
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Date
Msg-id CAMjNa7fqM8eRitHMfzVtXGZ_38g0kSie3MXvcWSAsJQpNs6ycA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
List pgsql-hackers
I'll give it a few days for objections before reverting.

I can only say that the lack of this feature comes up on a weekly basis on IRC, and a lot of people would be disappointed to see it reverted.

Not that my opinion matters, but I was very much looking forward to this feature in Postgres 10, but I understand if it just won't be stable enough to stay in.

I have my fingers crossed these issues can be resolved.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Get stuck when dropping a subscription duringsynchronizing table