On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 9:59 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 9:54 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 09:50:36AM +0900, Richard Guo wrote:
> > > Nice catch. The fix looks good to me. It seems to me that it's fine
> > > to go without a test case, since the fix is quite straightforward.
> > One could argue about using an injection point to force trick the
> > iteration loop to be cheaper, but I could not really get excited about
> > the coverage vs the cycles spent for it..
> Exactly.
I plan to go ahead and push Kevin's fix, barring any objections.
Thanks
Richard