Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
Date
Msg-id CAMbWs4-na1ynWwcanzQL85SyjgQ_QfNoxJ3vp3DH14iOtYiQ6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 4:47 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In the meantime, I think this test case is mighty artificial,
> and it wouldn't bother me any to just take it out again for the
> time being.

Yeah, I think we can remove the 't1.two+t2.two' test case if we go
with your proposed patch to address this performance regression.

Thanks
Richard

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing log_cnt from pg_sequence_read_tuple()
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Collect statistics about conflicts in logical replication