Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Nicola Contu
Subject Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2
Date
Msg-id CAMTZZh347xA_MsP53rKZA2xcLA=4QKX=XAfkEsRsvtnWFS3egQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2  (Nicola Contu <nicola.contu@gmail.com>)
Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Here is the strace as requested for pg11

Thanks

Il giorno mar 5 mar 2019 alle ore 17:47 Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> ha scritto:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:22 AM Nicola Contu <nicola.contu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not sure what you are requesting exactly but here is the strace for the start of the pg_ctl

I meant that you could run the server itself in the foreground under
strace, like so:

$ strace -f -c /usr/local/pgsql11.2/bin/postgres -D /db/pgsql11/data/

Then perform your testing, and finally stop it with pg_ctl from
another window (or hit ^C in this window) and strace should spit out a
table of system calls with some counters.  We might be able to see why
v11 is spending so much more time executing system calls than v10 for
your workload, or at least which systems calls they are, assuming you
run the same transactions against both versions.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Patrizio Bassi
Date:
Subject: how to restrict dba to access sensitive data
Next
From: Nicola Contu
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2