Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18
Date
Msg-id CAMMNXXnWxgaYYn0xEH36do=UWG_3a47Qq9cyvQ6MucGHh9c=Qw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18  (Attila Soki <atiware@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18
List pgsql-performance
On 24/2/26 17:48, Attila Soki wrote:
>> On 24 Feb 2026, at 16:57, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 24/2/26 16:50, Attila Soki wrote:
> I can provide more details on other parts of the query too, if that helps.

Only query and reproduction make sense for me to discover more deeply at
the moment.
It looks like we have managed to reproduce the potential 'Hash over
parameterised subtree' issue. Please check the attachment: there are two
plans. One plan has a longer execution time and more blocks hit, but its
cost estimate is four times lower. The EXPLAIN output does not show any
obvious estimation errors. This suggests there may be a bug in the cost
model.


--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Attila Soki
Date:
Subject: Re: unstable query plan on pg 16,17,18
Next
From: Feike Steenbergen
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE INTO... WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE index usage