Re: [GENERAL] B-tree index on a VARCHAR(4000) column - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John Turner
Subject Re: [GENERAL] B-tree index on a VARCHAR(4000) column
Date
Msg-id CAMAP1QmyPMCW8i5s4z0CBpnd--OrBkhU_pNVxjfBXB5udjhRyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] B-tree index on a VARCHAR(4000) column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:24 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

For every other purpose, PG just pays attention to the actual column
values' lengths.

Thanks for elaborating, Tom.  This would appear to be a(nother) case where PG represents the voice of sanity as compared with 'the other guys' : )

John

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: techmail+pgsql@dangertoaster.com
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_ident mapping Kerberos Usernames
Next
From: techmail+pgsql@dangertoaster.com
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_ident mapping Kerberos Usernames