Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Raúl Marín Rodríguez
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench
Date
Msg-id CAM6_UM67_GBF_8+ezJn6iEfXrwJVZHX_poeZY2cyerd_jfuZ=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

both patches seem complementary. I've rebased my changes on top of that patch
(v14) in https://git.io/vFtnT and everything seems to be working fine.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> Please add this patch to the upcoming commit fest if you would like to
>> get some feedback:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/
>>
>> I am adding as well Fabien in CC who worked in getting the internal
>> function infrastructure in the shape it is now (waaay better) with
>> commit 86c43f4.
>
> I think Raúl would do well to review this patch by Fabien
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710201835390.15170@lancre
> which adds a few functions and operators.

Good idea. pow() is not added by Fabien's patch, but an operator for
pow() could be something to add as well.
--
Michael



--
Raúl Marín Rodríguez
carto.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How to implement a SP-GiST index as a extension module?
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums