On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:22:26PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote: > I don't see any issue with this approach for fwrite().
Please feel free to discard my comment, then :)
> Another comment. Wouldn't be better to use "COPY FROM" and "COPY TO" in the > names to make it more obvious they are related to the COPY command?
Yeah, we had better do that. That's slightly cleaner for the user if they mix both COPY types at the same time, not requiring a mental mapping that FROM is a read and TO is a write.
v2 attached with the rename per feedback: COPY_DATA_READ/WRITE → COPY_FROM_READ/COPY_TO_WRITE.
Given how small this patch is, any chance it could still make PG19?
