Re: UUID v7 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikolay Samokhvalov
Subject Re: UUID v7
Date
Msg-id CAM527d8QbYa9CfsUezn_owUP8M0JWGYiosMEOkQqD6=PsncEnA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UUID v7  (Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au>)
Responses Re: UUID v7
Re: UUID v7
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 1:52 PM Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
That's right! There is no point in waiting for the official approval of the new RFC, which obviously will not change anything. I have been a contributor to this RFC for several years, and I can testify that every aspect imaginable has been thoroughly researched and agreed upon. Nothing new will definitely appear in the new RFC.

From a practical point of view, these two things are extremely important to have to support partitioning. It is better to implement limitations than throw them away.

Without them, this functionality will be of a very limited use in databases. We need to think about large tables – which means partitioning.

Nik

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
Next
From: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Date:
Subject: Re: UUID v7