Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikolay Samokhvalov
Subject Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
Date
Msg-id CAM527d87ebV6ES2m_HTmWS_8j3TjuEYokic1=UOkWHUB9OY2zg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert  (Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik@postgres.ai>)
Responses Re: pgstat: add pgstat_prep_pending() for entry ref pending setup
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 4:41 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> Looking at these now. The first issue is clearly a fast-path code
> problem. The 2nd one interacts with the existing non-fast-path code so
> I'll need to check if the bug predates fast-path.

Thanks Amit. In case helpful, here are two proposed fixes, with
regression tests.

Built and tested with assertions; regression and isolation suites pass.
An independent agent reviewed and tested both, catching a cleanup issue
that's now fixed. I didn't have time to fully study the patches manually,
but my harness tested them thoroughly.

Nik
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add PRODUCT() aggregate function
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explain what the default output_plugin_libraries do