Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZTka2jSuSZyZtPRah+UqQEsqsY9kJEBG27LJdhK-deHrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> (2) Default to using System V shared memory.  If people want POSIX
> shared memory, let them change the default.

> After some consideration, I think my vote is for option #2.

Wouldn't that become the call of packagers? Wasn't there already some
reason why it was advantageous for FreeBSD to continue to use System V
shared memory?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem