On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an utterly trivial point, I
> find the naming to be less than ideal: "poorman" is not a term I want
> to enshrine in our code. That's not very descriptive of what the
> patch is actually doing even if you know what the idiom means, and
> people whose first language - many of whom do significant work on our
> code - may not.
I didn't come up with the idea, or the name.
--
Peter Geoghegan