On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I, for one, agree with this position.
>
> Well, I, for one, find it frustrating. It seems pretty unhelpful to
> bring this up only after the code has already been written. The first
> post on this thread was on May 10th. The first version of the patch
> was posted on June 16th. This position was first articulated on
> September 15th.
Really, what do we have to lose at this point? It's not very difficult
to do what Andres proposes.
--
Peter Geoghegan
