Re: Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZT++pRSLzyKxOi8EX6cxmpJwcO3HLMRXGOJohk5wqbiPw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hash Indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Hash Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-09-28 15:04:30 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Andres already
>> stated that he things working on btree-over-hash would be more
>> beneficial than fixing hash, but at this point it seems like he's the
>> only one who takes that position.
>
> Note that I did *NOT* take that position. I was saying that I think we
> should evaluate whether that's not a better approach, doing some simple
> performance comparisons.

I, for one, agree with this position.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 fails with "invalid argument"
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take