On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> I haven't had time for a proper read of this patch, but I did
> immediately notice this:
>
> HINT: For example, ON CONFLICT ON CONFLICT (<column>).
>
> This should perhaps either be:
>
> HINT: For example, ON CONFLICT (<column>).
>
> or
>
> HINT: For example, ON CONFLICT ON CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>.
>
> But at the moment it seems to be neither.
What I'd intended here was the first suggestion of yours. Initially,
it was actually a combination of Thom's two suggestions, but this was
messed up at some point.
What I suggest is that this be changed to match the first suggestion
here (the intended message), since the "ON CONSTRAINT ... " variant is
really just an escape hatch that I don't expect will see much use. I
tried to encourage use of the conventional inference mechanism
everywhere.
--
Peter Geoghegan
