Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSXYNxyL6o6P2H3-h=V7D7iVd49XtEU8SjjLfEywjZL6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_class.relpages/allvisible probably shouldn't be a int4  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> And adding a proper unsigned type doesn't sound like a small amount of work.

Perhaps not, but it's overdue. We ought to have one.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5: UPDATE/DELETE .. ORDER BY .. LIMIT ..
Next
From: Sameer Thakur
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression of full-page-writes