Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSMVVaKoDDW7V+L3mGZggSj0nNG1zSGrTtDoy_w+9J0LA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results  (Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results  (Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you are right. Coverity is a very nice tool, and Clang has
> some growing to do.

To be fair to the LLVM/Clang guys, it's not as if static analysis is a
very high priority for them.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and pg_dumpall in real life
Next
From: Jeffrey Walton
Date:
Subject: Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results