Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZS7ziMoNnSZxLQk=RR955WYUiO7GtG3tKaX5AqYwHk3rQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the patch, but -1 for adding a GUC.

I'm pretty surprised that it's been suggested that some people might
prefer AccessExclusiveLocks. Why would anyone prefer that?


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Storing pg_stat_statements query texts externally, pg_stat_statements in core