On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My point is: I am not sure I can be defined as a reviewer of this
>> patch or take any credit in this patch review knowing that the latest
>> version submitted is a simple rebase of the version I did my first
>> review on. Hence, code speaking, this patch is in the same state as
>> when it has been firstly submitted.
>
> Of course you can. Time spent reviewing is time spent reviewing,
> whether it results in changes to the patch or not.
My thoughts exactly. I thought Michael did a good job, even if I
didn't agree with everything he said.
--
Peter Geoghegan
