Re: New CF app deployment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: New CF app deployment
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZS3RALThjA7MPuoZzUNjaNqoDK+GiyOLKKtnH8kip25Zw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New CF app deployment  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: New CF app deployment
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I think the old system where the patch submitter declared, this message
> contains my patch, is the only one that will work.

I tend to agree. That being said, calling out latest attachments is
also useful (or highlighting that a particular mail has a particular
file attached in general).

Annotations-wise, I think that it would be nice to be able to modify
an annotation, in case a typo is made (the old app supported this). I
also think that it's a waste of screen space to show "who" within the
annotation view. Granted, the old app supported this, but I tend to
think that if I actually cared who added a certain annotation, I'd be
happy to drill down into history. I haven't cared so far, AFAICR.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Really bad blowups with hash outer join and nulls
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW