Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZS07VKtrzNVAv5Nznf4o+DO-ovwoGEFmG7QWEwTSTp-ZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm about as much
> of a stickler for the details as you will find on this mailing list,
> or possibly, in the observable universe, but even I'm not willing to
> expend the amount of ink and emotional energy you have on whether a
> variable that holds +1, 0, or -1 ought to be declared as "int" or
> "int32".  Does it matter?  Yeah.  Is it worth this much argument?  No.


I haven't really spent very much time arguing about this point at all,
and intend to spend no more time on it. It's up to you.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort