Re: Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZRjyBhHnAVnHA1R6cJw7i-s++FXc=rSogK+=N+tQoVp-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> After looking at that a bit, I'm strongly tempted to just take out
> the last two sentences of the para, reducing it to the advice concerning
> maintenance_work_mem.  That seems sufficient to describe the current
> behavior, and given our awful track record about maintaining this
> documentation, I'm not sure that going into more detail is really
> a good idea.  Comments?

+1

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Broken order-of-operations in parallel query latch manipulation