Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZRj3+k+RpYxctpvHzUMchSEQpWroBiRiTdxzsjUeTj2RQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would be fine with adding a *compact* example of this kind to the
> table that begins section 8.14.3.  I probably would not back-patch it,
> because the absence of that example is not an error in the
> documentation, but I will not complain if someone else does.

How about the attached? It's a compact refinement of my original
example of more complicated jsonb containment.

I still think it would be a good idea to go back to 9.4. I have reason
to believe that people are getting confused on this point.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.