On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would be fine with adding a *compact* example of this kind to the
> table that begins section 8.14.3. I probably would not back-patch it,
> because the absence of that example is not an error in the
> documentation, but I will not complain if someone else does.
How about the attached? It's a compact refinement of my original
example of more complicated jsonb containment.
I still think it would be a good idea to go back to 9.4. I have reason
to believe that people are getting confused on this point.
--
Peter Geoghegan