On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I don't see a problem at all, with one exception: If we want the AS to
> be optional like in a bunch of other places, we have to either promote
> VALUES to a reserved keyword, only accept unreserved keywords, or play
> precedence games. I think it'd be perfectly fine to not make AS
> optional.
+1. In any case, we can't very well not support having any alias on the target.
--
Peter Geoghegan
