Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZROKcRSY0_96PtAMnRuirXbN=SpXNSs5JkD1fmHJ3NUWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
>> old functions to be consistent with their treatment in the new functions.
>> i.e. in the range [-n,-1] they should refer to the corresponding element
>> counting from the right.
>
> This patch is attached, along with a separate patch which adds a
> release note compatibility item.

Where are we on this? This is currently a 9.5 release blocker.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: copy.c handling for RLS is insecure