Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZR7VE=oKVpnHp0Pn624zaveQC3Y9wjSmXycKQV=yKiwHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I think there's zero overlap. They're completely complimentary features. It's not like normal WAL records have an
irrelevantvolume.
 

I'd have thought so too, but I would not like to assume. Like many
people commenting on this thread, I don't know very much about
compression.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: integrate pg_upgrade analyze_new_cluster.sh into vacuumdb