On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Gianni <nasus.maximos@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could there be a version of UPSERT where an update is tried, and if 0 records
> are modified, an insert is done?
>
> Just wondering, I haven't got am use-case for that. I don't mid gaps in
> sequences.
Perhaps, if you don't mind having a severely restricted set of
qualifications in the UPDATE, which the existing command effectively
has anyway. That would be a very odd thing.
--
Peter Geoghegan
