Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQzOOC-26ndmxAw3etUHH3A88JG=ee+ccT_Y2dTd82oMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Given this, I'm on board with just removing the weasel-wording about
> timer resolution, except maybe for commit_delay where useful values
> are small enough that it's a hazard on old systems.

+1, but I'd move the guidance for commit_delay's effective resolution
from "29.4. WAL Configuration" to where commit_delay is introduced,
"18.5. Write Ahead Log".


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_upgrade data directory inside old one?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?