Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQvA=+75su3pLemzj1LM6Wcxqbi0RjAABbgDsf+gEcMJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do agree that an indefinite development freeze with unclear
> parameters for resuming development and unclear goals is a bad plan.
> But I think giving ourselves a little more time to, say, turn the
> buildfarm consistently green, and, say, fix the known but
> currently-unfixed multixact bugs, and, say, fix the known bugs in 9.5
> features is a good plan, and I hope you and others will support it.

FWIW, I have 3 pending bug fixes for UPSERT. While those are pretty
benign issues, I'd be annoyed if they didn't get into the first 9.5
beta (or alpha, even).

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1