Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQdgG=4kcuTd_rK6p5hQBF8EzomXVQ0RfJmJvHX5pK7sw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, I agree that it's not worth the risk conflating the two
> optimizations. That one can be done later as a separate patch.

I'm rather fond of the assertions about tape number that exist within
root_displace currently. But, yeah, maybe.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication WIP