On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> But those pages are supposed to be used as the index grows. So unless
> they are forgotten by the FSM, they shouldn't accumulate. (Except where
> the table doesn't grow but only shrinks, so there's no need for new
> index pages, but I don't think that's an interesting case.)
Sure. I'm talking about a narrow issue around how things are
represented in pgstatindex() only.
--
Peter Geoghegan
