Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQaXwzFu_c3ZWVeUj6-ck62zVVfF47KgB0NP7Hg+BcNBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> There are only tiny differences, which in any case you can see in the
> commit log on Github. There is no reason why code review needs to
> block on this V3, IMV.

Also, I don't think that we need to include V2's tests now that there
is independent test coverage for external sorts, which is a recent
development. I imagine that the V2 test run duration might be
problematic on some buildfarm animals. I'll omit that in V3.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Next
From: "K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres abort found in 9.3.11