Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQRXNqgNp1kAPRsJH+VzQtRx7s6m98LVtxyugDipdcowQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> Given that exclusion constraints can only be used with IGNORE, and
> given that this is so hard to recreate, I'm inclined to conclude that
> it's acceptable. It's certainly way better than risking livelocks by
> not having "deadlock insurance".

Uh, I mean "livelock insurance" here, of course.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow SQL/plpgsql functions to accept record