Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQPgfG8PwbirJ3Eefk_igu0GtzLVcjwsDBrYU4W+VUuOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> Andres didn't mention how big the performance benefit he saw with pgbench
> was, but I bet it was barely distinguishible from noise. But that's OK. In
> fact, there's no reason to believe this would make any difference to
> performance. The point is to make the code more readable, and it certainly
> achieves that.

+1


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication