Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQNYkRBHEEsRj80qypnpxRsP00HE7x8x-kZ796Ukgm=Ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> We somehow need to have a policy of testing changes to the WAL format
> without full_page_writes. They hide bugs in replay far, far too often.

What's the easiest way to get atomic page writes at the FS level on
your laptop? ZFS or some data journaling FS, I suppose.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.7
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.7