On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> I find this added test duration reasonable. If someone identifies a way to
> realize similar coverage with lower duration, I'd value that contribution. -1
> for meeting some runtime target at the expense of coverage. Older modules
> have rather little test coverage, so they're poor as benchmarks.
+1.
--
Peter Geoghegan
