On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have automatic buildfarm coverage on many platforms. Perhaps we
> could live without that with a buildfarm module though.
It's not clear that buildfarm coverage makes sense for sqlsmith. If it
does make sense, I see no reason why introducing it should be attached
to sqlsmith's inclusion in core.
--
Peter Geoghegan
