Re: Should commit_delay be PGC_SIGHUP? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Should commit_delay be PGC_SIGHUP?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQ+RVikQ2Nwt+WKKneqxaJ8X3zK3ND+-6MS1Gu4qDh5JA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should commit_delay be PGC_SIGHUP?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is fine with me, too, and I agree that it's warranted... but your
> commit message supposes that this behavior is new in 9.3, and I think
> it dates to 9.2.

No, it doesn't. It just missed the deadline for 9.2.

I'm happy enough to have the setting be PGC_SUSET, since that more or
less conveys that commit_delay isn't something that is sensible to set
dynamically.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ants Aasma
Date:
Subject: Re: Page replacement algorithm in buffer cache
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON Function Bike Shedding