On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I wrote: > Hm ... actually, we probably need *both* types of changes if that's > what we believe the state values mean.
I too was confused with the state explanations from the code-comments which we have them now. With your explanation here clears that. Thanks for explaining those.
After a bit more thinking and experimentation, I propose the attached patch.
I had a look over the patch and reviewed it. It is in excellent state to check-in.
regards, tom lane
Thanks
--
Jeevan B Chalke Principal Software Engineer, Product Development EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company